While preparing my Masters thesis, I came a across an interesting quote from Muhammad b. Idris al-Shafi’i, the famous jurist and author of the first work of Islamic legal theory, al-Risalah. After explaining the need to consult others before issuing juristic opinion:
[Consultation should be sought] regardless of whether those consulted agree or disagree; in fact those that disagree [with you] should be given priority, so as to help resolve what juristic opinion is applicable. One should ponder over their evidences, then decide. [al-Bahr al-Mudhhab of al-Ruyani 11/170]
Shariah Boards tend to lean towards one legal methodology; that is expected in any decision making group. There has been a trend though to filter opinions until the only thing you are left with are those that you agree with (or should I say, agree with you).
This seems similar to a moral hazard, when a party insulated from risk may behave differently than it would behave if it were fully exposed to the risk. Excluding dissenting opinions would protect any group from the risk of re-evalution, analysis, and reputation risks. If we consider Shariah Boards to be representative of general shareholder assembly, any Shariah Board which is asymmetric in its makeup would seem to be susceptible to a double-sided principal–agent problem.
Cooking Rice, Not Engineering It: Al-Shatibi’s Guidance on relevance in Usul al-Fiqh Studies
May 17, 2023
Consider the process of teaching someone to cook rice. You wouldn’t initially throw them into a deep discussion about the variations among Fahrenheit, Celsius, and…
Is it Forbidden to Pay Riba? Or is it only forbidden to charge it?
September 8, 2022
Recently someone presented to me the opinion or the assumption that it’s not forbidden to pay interest, it’s only forbidden to take interest claiming that…
Is SAFE document Equity Conversion Shariah Compliant?
March 23, 2021
SAFE documents are not loans. They are warrants for future equity. The structure found in the SAFE agreement is permissible and offers a viable, interest-free…
Consultation, Moral Hazard, & Shariah Boards
Joe Bradford
| 02/23/2010
Home » Articles » legal development » Consultation, Moral Hazard, & Shariah Boards
While preparing my Masters thesis, I came a across an interesting quote from Muhammad b. Idris al-Shafi’i, the famous jurist and author of the first work of Islamic legal theory, al-Risalah. After explaining the need to consult others before issuing juristic opinion:
Shariah Boards tend to lean towards one legal methodology; that is expected in any decision making group. There has been a trend though to filter opinions until the only thing you are left with are those that you agree with (or should I say, agree with you).
This seems similar to a moral hazard, when a party insulated from risk may behave differently than it would behave if it were fully exposed to the risk. Excluding dissenting opinions would protect any group from the risk of re-evalution, analysis, and reputation risks. If we consider Shariah Boards to be representative of general shareholder assembly, any Shariah Board which is asymmetric in its makeup would seem to be susceptible to a double-sided principal–agent problem.
Share
Related Posts
Cooking Rice, Not Engineering It: Al-Shatibi’s Guidance on relevance in Usul al-Fiqh Studies
May 17, 2023
Is it Forbidden to Pay Riba? Or is it only forbidden to charge it?
September 8, 2022
Personal Finance: What is your net worth?
August 24, 2022
NFTs: Non-Fungible Tokens – A Very Simple Explanation
November 19, 2021
When is staking your crypto allowed?
November 16, 2021
What makes a crypto coin Shariah Compliant?
November 16, 2021
Zakat on Assets – A Quick Review
April 12, 2021
Is SAFE document Equity Conversion Shariah Compliant?
March 23, 2021
Book Excerpt – The Greatest Gifts
June 10, 2020